Re: Round robin load balance to local port range

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
> On 06/11/09 17:55, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>> The manpage is incorrect (patches welcome :), it will use the first
>> port as long as the tuples don't clash. The --random option can be
>> used to randomly select a port from the range.
>> -- 
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>    
> 
> --random does the job both for DNAT and REDIRECT
> I guess random is better that nothing :)
> 
> Just for clarification: the state of the packet will be remembered right?
> I don't want to send it first to one port and later to another.

Correct.

> ps. I found another bug
> --random in DNAT has to be put at the end of the rule
> otherwise if you put it before --to-destination
> error: "Multiple --to-destination not supported"

Thanks, fixed in git.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux