Re: intrapositioned and extrapositioned negation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



netfilter-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Mart Frauenlob wrote:
Mart Frauenlob wrote:
Hello,

today I installed iptables 1.4.5 and discovered my ruleset produces
those warnings about intrapositioned  negation:
Using intrapositioned negation (`--option ! this`) is deprecated in
favor of extrapositioned (`! --option this`).

I haven't completely looked up the changelogs, but from what I've
found on the internet, this was introduced with 1.4.3.1, right?

However, my ruleset is automatically generated by a self written shell
script, which I now need to change.
It needs to work with any 2.6 kernel and with 2.4 kernels supporting
iptables.
As my testing options (hardware, time) are limited, I'm asking if
someone knows:

Will 2.4 kernels and older iptables versions accept the
extrapositioned (`! --option this`) notation?
If so, I can rewrite my script to always use extrapositioned syntax.
Lot's of work, but ok...

If not, what kernel / iptables versions do only understand the old
deprecated way?
So I can query for them and take the appropriate steps.

Thanks a lot!
Nobody knows?
Well, I've found some old virtual machines, tested it with debian woody
and sarge, using kernel 2.4.18.bf2-4 and 2.6.18 and extrapositioned
negation does not seem to cause problems.
Am I right to assume, that all 2.4 kernels with iptables support - DON'T
have troubles using extrapositioned negation???

The kernel doesn't care about how you specify negation, its purely
a userspace thing. So yes, it should work properly on any kernel
version.

Hello netfilter-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx :)

thanks for pointing that out.
In my second post I forgot to ask about the compatible iptables version.
The lowest version I tested on debian woody is: 1.2.6a.
Rephrased, do I have to expect problems using extrapositioned negation on older iptables versions?

Sidenote to the devels ;-P :
The man page has documented intrapositioned negation for years, this is the only note in the changelog for 1.4.3.2:
iptables: print negation extrapositioned

It's like with the DROP in the nat table, a short note in the change log, and the whole world has to find out what's going on, and change their programs/scripts.
Imho, changes like those should be worth a few explaining sentences.

Thanks and regards


Mart

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux