Rick Jones wrote:
...
Is there a specific reason you cannot further subnet the 10.0.0.0/8 network for
your HDLC channels and eschew the NAT? Then at least ignoring the issue of
"routing" broadcast datagrams (these are IP broadcasts and not simply ethernet
broadcasts right?) reaching-out and touching the HDLC devices from the WAN would
seem to be more straightforward.
rick jones
visions of many static routing table entries floating through his head
The 10.0.0.0/8 network is an existing network that has 100's of computers on it. We are planning on
using some 10.x.0.0/16 addresses to NETMAP to the 172.16.0.0/16 addresses in some limited
situations, but this doesn't solve the problem of routing to the correct HDLC channel to get to the
final destination.
Greg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
