Re: Forward traffic between two interfaces on the same host

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2009/10/7 Richard Horton <richard.horton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> 2009/10/7 Kostas Pelechrinis <kpele_ntua@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am new in using iptables so I would like to do a few questions for something that maybe many of you find easy :)
>>
>> In particular, I have a laptop with two wireless interfaces, a Wifi and a 3G.  I would like to share the 3G broadband connection available on this laptop with other machines within my home/internal network through the wifi interface.  I would like to ask if such functionality is possible to be implemented using iptables.
>>
>> Even more specific what I need is a 'relay'-like functionality.  Let's assume that laptop A has the two interfaces and laptop B has only a wifi interface.  Laptop-B will be connected with laptop A through the wifi and laptop A needs to serve all the internet requests of laptop B through the 3G usb modem interface.
>>
>> I think that I need to use rules like the following for laptop A :
>>
>> (I use the names wifi0 and 3g0 for the corresponding interfaces and xxx.yyy.zzz.www for the ip of the 3G interface)
>> iptables -A FORWARD -i wifi0 -o 3g0 -j ACCEPT
>> iptables -A FORWARD -i 3g0 -o wifi0 -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
>> iptables -A POSTROUTING -t nat -s 192.168.0.0/24 -o eth0 -j SNAT --to-source xxx.yyy.zzz.www
>>
>> Do I miss something here ?  Do I need to take care of something else as well?
>
> Check that forwarding is turned on in the kernel...
>
> sysctl net.ipv4.ip_forward should return net.ipv4.ip_forward=1, if it
> doesn't execute 'sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_forward=1' to enable it.
>
> Not sure on the NAT rules as I have very little to do with NAT as
> we're using iptables on a private internal network where the address
> space in the private ranges is more than adequate enough (using all 3
> classes of private addresses)
>
>


In addition to Richard's comments: It seems wrong to suddenly have
eth0 on the nat-rule instead of 3g0. Also, if you get a dynamic
ip-address on the 3g-interface, you might want to use MASQUERADE
instead of SNAT.

/Oskar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux