> Hello, > > I'm happy to announce ipset release 3.1. A few minor bugs were > fixed and some cleanups added: I'm a few errors when compiling this version on Centos 5.3, kernel 2.6.18-128.4.1.el5.centos.plus-i686. /usr/local/src/ipset/ipset-3.1/kernel/ip_set_iptree.c: In function 'iptree_create': /usr/local/src/ipset/ipset-3.1/kernel/ip_set_iptree.c:285: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'unsigned int' /usr/local/src/ipset/ipset-3.1/kernel/ip_set_iptree.c:285: warning: format '%zu' expects type 'size_t', but argument 3 has type 'long unsigned int' When I switched arguments 2 and 3 for function ip_set_printk(),these errors are gone. > - Fix the definition of 'bool' for kernels <= 2.6.18 (Jan > Engelhardt) This also generates an error for me. /usr/local/src/ipset/ipset-3.1/kernel/ip_set_setlist.c:20: error: redefinition of typedef 'bool' include/linux/types.h:36: error: previous declaration of 'bool' was here /usr/local/src/ipset/ipset-3.1/kernel/ip_set_setlist.c:21: error: redeclaration of enumerator 'false' include/linux/stddef.h:16: error: previous definition of 'false' was here /usr/local/src/ipset/ipset-3.1/kernel/ip_set_setlist.c:21: error: redeclaration of enumerator 'true' include/linux/stddef.h:18: error: previous definition of 'true' was here When I changed <= into < it compiled fine. I am by no means a C developer, so please correct me if I'm doing the wrong thing. I just played around and with these small changes I have ipset compiling cleanly. Don't know if the changes are correct and didn't test yet if everything works though. I attached one diff for both files. Grts, Rob
Attachment:
ipset-3.1-centos-53-2.6.18-128.4.1.el5.centos.plus-i686.diff
Description: Binary data
