Danger. Possible flame bait ahead. On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 08:39:02PM +0200, Elvir Kuric wrote: > Use CARP, it is best and try to set up it on OpenBSD. On linux it is > ucarp, but I would recommend > OpenBSD + CARP Given that the OP was looking for an active/active solution and thus is presumably interested in performance as well, I wonder why you would recommend OpenBSD's pf+carp. In the last performance comparison I read some years back pf was almost an order of magnitude slower than iptables at the time. We for instance run a pair of OpenBSD boxen on some old 933 GHz P3s with 4 ste/Sundance ST201-NICs each and they basically don't even manage data transfers at the full 100mbit/s. Stability? Features? Security? Just curious... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
