Hello, guys. Please, review attached patch. It should fix: http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=568 At least it did for me with testcase user provided in our bugzilla: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=254496 -- Peter.
Author: pva@xxxxxxxxxx Fixes bug http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=254496 === modified file 'extensions/libxt_hashlimit.c' --- extensions/libxt_hashlimit.c 2009-01-21 18:23:22 +0000 +++ extensions/libxt_hashlimit.c 2009-01-21 18:23:32 +0000 @@ -636,7 +636,7 @@ if (info->cfg.max != 0) printf("--hashlimit-htable-max %u ", info->cfg.max); if (info->cfg.gc_interval != XT_HASHLIMIT_GCINTERVAL) - printf("--hashlimit-htable-gcinterval %u", info->cfg.gc_interval); + printf("--hashlimit-htable-gcinterval %u ", info->cfg.gc_interval); if (info->cfg.expire != XT_HASHLIMIT_EXPIRE) printf("--hashlimit-htable-expire %u ", info->cfg.expire);
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=AD=D1=82=D0=B0?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=D1=87=D0=B0=D1=81=D1=82=D1=8C?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=D1=81=D0=BE=D0=BE=D0=B1=D1=89=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=B8=D1=8F?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=B0?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=D1=86=D0=B8=D1=84=D1=80=D0=BE=D0=B2=D0=BE=D0=B9?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D1=8C=D1=8E?=
