On Thu, 6 Nov 2008, Karthik V wrote: > I agree with the stupid IP part...it was just for the mail. I did try > quite a few IP addresses. > > But on the comment about it not being part of 2.4. I assumed that > iprange is patched when I received the following message: > Error: iprange: Bad IP Address ..... Pretty sure it entered > libipt_iprange: parse_iprange function. I think this message just means that your userspace iptables tool supports iprange, and does not say anything about the kernel side. > > -Karthik > > On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Sven-Haegar Koch <haegar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 6 Nov 2008, Karthik V wrote: > > > >> I am faced with a weird error for IPTABLES version 1.2.9 on 2.4 > >> kernel. The following command: > >> > >> iptables -A INPUT -m iprange --src-range 192.168.0.0-192.168.0.0 -j ACCEPT > >> > >> - fails on 2.4 Kernel with Error: No chain/target/match by that name. > >> > >> - But the same command is working on other systems with 2.6 kernel > >> viz., Fedora Core 6 Desktop and OpenWRT router. > > > > I think kernel 2.4 just does not support -m iprange at all, unless you > > patched it to your kernel tree yourself. > > > > Also the range '192.168.0.0-192.168.0.0' looks quite stupid to me, as > > this is just one address. > > > > c'ya > > sven > > > > -- > > > > The Internet treats censorship as a routing problem, and routes around > > it. (John Gilmore on http://www.cygnus.com/~gnu/) > > > > > > c'ya sven -- The Internet treats censorship as a routing problem, and routes around it. (John Gilmore on http://www.cygnus.com/~gnu/) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
