Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Grant Taylor wrote:
Is this close to what you are wanting to happen? (Let me know before
I explain how to make this happen.)
Um...no. Too complicated.
Now that we're discussing that - let's change gears and talk about it
differently.
A==>C<==>D<===B
No Internet - but still private networks. So Router C has a route for
the network 'A' 192.168.0.0/24 and route to reach router 'D'. Router
'D' knows about network 'B' 192.168.1.0 and router 'C'. D and C talk to
each other, just because, on their own network of 172.16.0.0/16.
Is any NAT required for this conversation? In particular - do Linux
routers require SNAT lines for this? Or just routing tables?
--
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
