Re: What's required for a stateful firewall + ipvs in 2.6 kernel?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/23/08 05:09, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
The last time that I had a look at the antefacto patch it look to me like a hack. IIRC, the problem is the LVS design (at least time ago when I had a look at it) as it bypasses the network stack. This screws up the possibility of having stateful firewalling and LVS.

I can offer a recent confirmation (with in the last three months) that LVS does indeed still interfere with firewalling.



Grant. . . .
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux