On Monday 2008-04-14 09:52, whiplash wrote: > Jan Engelhardt ha scritto: > >> No need. If you add the interface address, rules for the subnet >> will automatically be added, in other words: >> >> ip addr add 192.168.1.2/24 dev eth0 >> >> will cause 192.168.1.0/24 to show up in `ip route` (preferred over `route`) >> with a 'proto kernel', which says the kernel created this one automatically. > > Uhm, yes, this is correct. > But I was not talking about adding routing on linux box, but on *XP* boxes. > Right, I already wondered about the strange trailing argument. Then again, why not just use the default route [if it fits]?- still needs no extra routes :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
