Re: NAT addresses - RFC or tradition?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



rfc 1918
Tim Evans wrote:
> On Tue, 22 May 2007 16:46:25 -0300, Andre Guimarães wrote
>   
>> It's quite simple.
>> You're using public IPs in your internal networks.
>> Some of these IPs may exist and have an owner an maybe even a web site.
>> You'll be in trouble in the day you wish to acess one of these IPs 
>> on the internet because you won't reach them because you have them 
>> on your network and so won't route the packets to the internet.
>>     
>
> In other words, the RFC addresses are specifically for use in internal
> networks, since they are guaranteed not to be used on the public internet, and
> not routed to by any public internet router.
> --
> Tim Evans, TKEvans.com, Inc.    |    5 Chestnut Court
> tkevans@xxxxxxxxxxx             |    Owings Mills, MD 21117
> http://www.tkevans.com/         |    443-394-3864
> http://www.come-here.com/News/  |
>
>
>   




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux