Paul, I believe that's correct. Although I'm still not Sure what was originally meant by "experimental tcp options". -marc > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Blondé [mailto:jpb@xxxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 11:09 AM > To: netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: is it possible to block ip packets that contains > experimentaltcp options ? > > I assume that LOG-AND-DROP is your own chain, crafted so that > you can perform both functions with a single entry? > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Paul Blondé > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: netfilter-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > [mailto:netfilter-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > Marc Cozzi > > Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 5:19 AM > > To: netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: RE: is it possible to block ip packets that contains > > experimentaltcp options ? > > > > > > > > Glenn, > > > > Not sure what you mean by "experimental" however, there are some > > conditions of flags that should never occur on the network. > These can > > be trapped with rules similar to the following. > > > > iptables -A BLOCKED -m state --state INVALID -j > LOG-AND-DROP iptables > > -A BLOCKED -p tcp --tcp-flags ALL ALL -j LOG-AND-DROP iptables -A > > BLOCKED -p tcp --tcp-flags ALL NONE -j LOG-AND-DROP > > > > --marc > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Glenn Terjesen [mailto:glenn@xxxxxxxxx] > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 5:24 AM > > > To: netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Subject: is it possible to block ip packets that contains > > > experimental tcp options ? > > > > > > Hello, > > > got a iptables firewall filtering our servers. > > > > > > Is it possible to block tcp packets that contains > experimental tcp > > > options ? > > > > > > AND is it smart to do so ? > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Mvh Glenn Terjesen @ Webcat AS > > > Tlf: +47 37 02 20 20 > > > E-post: support@xxxxxxxxx > > > > > > >
