Re: Two NICs, same network...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Why do you no investigate channel bonding ?

semi linux escribió:
> On 5/8/07, David Lang <david.lang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Tue, 8 May 2007, semi linux wrote:
>>
>> > I've got an odd problem where I've got two NICs on the same network
>> > and I want all traffic to one IP to go out one interface and all other
>> > traffic to use the second interface.  I'm going to try an simplify my
>> > actual setup, because a lot of it makes no difference to this post...
>> >
>> > I know this has to be a iptables sort of setup since the routing table
>> > can only make a difference on different networks and not based on
>> > looking for a specific IP address.
>> >
>> > The question is:
>> >
>> > eth0 IP: 10.1.1.1
>> > eth1 IP: 10.1.1.2
>> >
>> > target: 10.1.1.3
>> >
>> > (these IPs are just examples, there are no hard-fast rules surrounding
>> > the other possibilities)
>> >
>> > How do I make sure this goes out eth1 instead of eth0?  Do I use the
>> > mangle rule with the physdev module?
>> >
>> > I feel like I'm overlooking something or forgetting my basic network
>> > ideas here...
>>
>> you haven't quite given enough info here
>>
>> if you have target2 10.1.1.4 and you want all traffic to target to go
>> out eth0
>> and all traffic to target2 to go out eth1 then you would want to
>> start out with
>> defining host routes (the routing table _can_ look at specific hosts,
>> not just
>> networks)
>>
>> in addition, I believe that you will need to play around with arp
>> filtering to
>> make sure that each NIC only responds to arp requests for it's IP
>> addresses.
>>
>> if you really only have one remote IP address and two local addresses
>> and you
>> want all communications between the target and  10.1.1.1 to use eth0
>> while
>> all communications between the target and 10.1.1.2 to use eth1 things
>> get more
>> complicated
>>
>> you would need to look into packet/connection tagging and iptables
>> routeing
>> decisions.
>>
>> rather then try and go into that right now why don't you try to be a
>> little
>> clearer about exactly what you are trying to do.
>>
>> David Lang
>>
>
> Ok... you asked for the whole thing, here it is (forget my previous
> example):
>
> eth0 - 10.1.1.1
> eth1 - N/A
> eth2 - N/A
> br0 (eth1, eth2) - 10.1.1.2
> target - 10.1.1.3
>
> The bridge (br0) is setup using brctl and seems to work w/o problem...
> The eth1 and eth2 IP addresses really don't matter since they are both
> referenced via the bridge and are set to something invalid.  10.1.1.3
> is connected via cross-over cable to eth2 port.  br0 and eth0 are
> connected to my network on the same subnet.
>
> What I'd like:
> - all packets (from the network or local) where destination=10.1.1.3
> to be routed to eth2.
> - otherwise, all traffic from the network to use eth0 for I/O.
>
> Basically, I want to specify that ONLY traffic for 10.1.1.3 is to use
> eth2.
>


-- 
ZEN SOLUCIONES - Be in XForms take your "ConcentrÈ"
SÈbastien CRAMATTE 

Plaza Sandoval, 5, piso 4b
30004 Murcia - ESPA—A

MÛvil : +34 627 66 52 83
Fijo : +34 968 29 29 65

E-mail : scramatte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Site : www.zensoluciones.com

Skype : scramatte
Msn : scramatte@xxxxxxxxxxx
Jabber: scramatte@xxxxxxxxxx
--

CONCENTR…
xml entreprise grade framework
http://concentre.zensoluciones.com

--
This e-mail is privileged and may contain confidential information intended only for the person(s) named above. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete it. E-mail and internet transmissions can't be warrant privacy, integrity or correct reception. The sender will not be liable for any damages resulting. 

Este mensaje va dirigido, de manera exclusiva, a su destinatario y puede contener informaciÛn confidencial. En caso de haber recibido este mensaje por error, informe al emisor inmediatamente y proceda a su eliminaciÛn. El correo electrÛnico y las comunicaciones por medio de Internet no permiten garantizar la confidencialidad de los mensajes transmitidos, asÌ como tampoco su integridad o su correcta de recepciÛn. El emisor no asume responsabilidad alguna por tales circunstancias.

Ce message est destinÈ exclusivement ‡ son destinataire et peut contenir des informations confidentielles. En cas de rÈception d'un tel message par erreur, informez l'expÈditeur immÈdiatement et procÈdez ‡ son effacement. Il n'est pas possible de garantir la confidentialitÈ, l'intÈgritÈ ou la rÈception correcte du courrier Èlectronique ainsi que des communications par internet. L'expÈditeur ne peut Ítre tenu pour responsable d'Èventuels dommages commis.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux