Hi All,
wondering if it is right place to ask this question?
can anyone give clue about this problem?
appreciate your help
-Lokesh
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:05:15 +0530
To: netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Lokesh <lokeshnb@xxxxxxxxxx>
X-Virus-Scanned: by Intoto Anti-X 1.0; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:00:54 +0530
X-Spam-Scanned: by Intoto Anti-X 1.0; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:00:54 +0530
X-Spam-RefID: str=0001.0A090208.46271AAD.00D3,ss=1,fgs=0
X-Virus-Scanned: by Intoto Anti-X 1.0; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:00:49 +0530
X-Spam-Scanned: by Intoto Anti-X 1.0; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:00:49 +0530
X-Spam-RefID: str=0001.0A090208.46271AA8.00DA,ss=1,fgs=0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.41
Subject: Async processing using NetFilters
X-Virus-Scanned: by Intoto Anti-X 1.0;
Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:26:37 +0530
X-Spam-Scanned: by Intoto Anti-X 1.0;
Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:26:37 +0530
X-Spam-RefID: str=0001.0A090204.462720B5.0025:SCGMAF58662,ss=1,fgs=0
X-BeenThere: netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
List-Id: General discussion and user questions <netfilter.lists.netfilter.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>,
<mailto:netfilter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </pipermail/netfilter>
List-Post: <mailto:netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-Help: <mailto:netfilter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>,
<mailto:netfilter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe>
Sender: netfilter-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi All,
I'm using Linux RedHat 9 kernel version 2.4.20-8
I want to do some asynchronous processing of packets in my kernel
module that is registered as
Netfilter Hook. I tried to make use of NF_QUEUE but found that only
one call back function per
protocol family (PF) is provided and already some module (probably
NET_LINK socket interface)
is making use of it for PF_INET. Is there any way to use NF_QUEUE
facility without disturbing
NET_LINK ? why per hook registration of call back function of
NF_QUEUE is not provided?
How to proceed if someone had to do async processing of packets so
that pkts can be queued to crypto hardware processing unit and can
be safely reinjected back into kernel later so that other registered
hooks can get pkts?
any help is highly appreciated.
Thanks
-Lokesh.
********************************************************************************
This email message (including any attachments) is for the sole use
of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential,
proprietary and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the
intended recipient, please immediately notify the sender by reply
email and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you.
Intoto Inc.
********************************************************************************
This email message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)
and may contain confidential, proprietary and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient,
please immediately notify the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Thank you.
Intoto Inc.
