Re: SNAT seems to "miss" some packets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: SNAT seems to "miss" some packets
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 14:24:47 +0100 (MET)
Cc: netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1003211157.20070129141238@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1003211157.20070129141238@xxxxxxxxxx>

>iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth2  -j SNAT -s 10.0.0.0/16 --to-source 217.221.234.74

Make sure there are no other terminating rules in POSTROUTING that could stop a
packet from reaching this SNAT rule.


	-`J'
--

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SNAT seems to "miss" some packets
  - From: Fabio Muzzi

References:
- SNAT seems to "miss" some packets
  - From: Fabio Muzzi

Prev by Date: SNAT seems to "miss" some packets
Next by Date: Re: SNAT seems to "miss" some packets
Previous by thread: SNAT seems to "miss" some packets
Next by thread: Re: SNAT seems to "miss" some packets
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Netfilter Development] [Linux Kernel Networking Development] [Netem] [Berkeley Packet Filter] [Linux Kernel Development] [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control] [Bugtraq]

Powered by Linux