Re: PPTP Problem with 2.6.20-rc1 >=

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: PPTP Problem with 2.6.20-rc1 >=
From: TheGesus <thegesus@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 16:02:25 -0500
Cc: netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <06d701c739b0$2164a5e0$0a01a8c0@pcjorge>
References: <001d01c7399d$66573b30$0301a8c0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45AD3872.4060103@xxxxxxxxx> <06d701c739b0$2164a5e0$0a01a8c0@pcjorge>

On 1/16/07, Jorge Bastos <mysql.jorge@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hum... Yes

There's changes now?


http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/9/217

References:
- PPTP Problem with 2.6.20-rc1 >=
  - From: Jorge Bastos
- Re: PPTP Problem with 2.6.20-rc1 >=
  - From: Michael Gale
- Re: PPTP Problem with 2.6.20-rc1 >=
  - From: Jorge Bastos

Prev by Date: Re: PPTP Problem with 2.6.20-rc1 >=
Next by Date: Re: CONNMARK versus MARK
Previous by thread: Re: PPTP Problem with 2.6.20-rc1 >=
Next by thread: Re: PPTP Problem with 2.6.20-rc1 >=
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Netfilter Development] [Linux Kernel Networking Development] [Netem] [Berkeley Packet Filter] [Linux Kernel Development] [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control] [Bugtraq]

Powered by Linux