Re: Patch for h323 conntack for certain kernels

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Just to follow-up: the bittorrent match seems to work fine, just the h323 
doesn't. I was using that for testing, just to make sure that l7filters is 
installed properly.

I added a SIP match just in case this phone speaks SIP language, but I don't 
think I need it.

On Wednesday 20 December 2006 12:57, Alan Ezust wrote:
> I just patched 2.6.16.29 with the h323 patchlets from a version of
> patchomatic in the archives. lsmod shows me that these modules are properly
> loaded.
>
> ip_nat_sip              3936  0
> ip_conntrack_sip        6960  1 ip_nat_sip
> ip_nat_h323             2368  0
> ip_conntrack_h323      70080  1 ip_nat_h323
>
> Then I added a couple of matches
> iptables -t promisc -I PROMISC -m layer7 --l7proto "bittorrent"
> iptables -t promisc -I PROMISC -m layer7 --l7proto "h323"
> iptables -t promisc -I PROMISC -m layer7 --l7proto "sip"
>
> I expected after making some phonecalls and running a bittorrent client,
> I'd see some packets and bytes listed when I did iptables -L -t promisc -nv
>
>  pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source
> destination
>     0     0            0    --  *      *       0.0.0.0/0           
> 0.0.0.0/0 LAYER7 l7proto bittorrent
>     0     0            0    --  *      *       0.0.0.0/0           
> 0.0.0.0/0 LAYER7 l7proto sip
>     0     0            0    --  *      *       0.0.0.0/0           
> 0.0.0.0/0 LAYER7 l7proto h323
>
>
> But it seems that none of these matches are getting detected...
> Has anyone succeeded in getting the h323 match working?
>
> I'd like to try to debug it, but I think what I would be very useful for
> debugging is some sort of formal protocol specification that describes how
> the H323 protocol is suppoed to look. Does such a thing exist in the public
> domain?
>
> On Thursday 30 November 2006 03:21, ArcosCom Linux User wrote:
> > Hi, I'm trying to patch kernel 2.6.16.34 with h323 conntrack patches, but
> > I don't found it in pom-ng.
> >
> > I'm thinking in take it from 2.6.19 kernel (the *h323* files and take a
> > view in Kconfigs and Makefiles files).
> >
> > I know from 2.6.17 series, h323 where into kernel and they patched
> > sometimes h323 sources.
> >
> > Could anybody say me if copying the files into 2.6.16.34 sources and
> > modifiying Kconfig and Makefile files it will work?
> >
> > Thanks

-- 
Alan Ezust            www.presinet.com
Presinet, inc         alan.ezust@xxxxxxxxxxxx
           Victoria, BC, Canada

Attachment: pgpis3JzmLDkI.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux