Re: IPv6 state match - possible bug.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: IPv6 state match - possible bug.
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:14:18 +0100
Cc: darktama@xxxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200602150432.k1F4WR99027202@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1139965907.8973.1.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200602141843.k1EIhnqD012520@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1139973329.9018.2.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200602150432.k1F4WR99027202@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051019)

Yasuyuki KOZAKAI wrote:
> Thanks for test. Harald or Patrick, please apply attached patch.
> # I've added "Spotted by Ben Skeggs" to previous one.

Also applied, thanks.

References:
- Re: IPv6 state match - possible bug.
  - From: Ben Skeggs
- Re: IPv6 state match - possible bug.
  - From: Ben Skeggs

Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.16-rc3 panic related to IP Forwarding and/or Netfilter
Next by Date: Re: Problem with state match for ip6tables
Previous by thread: Re: IPv6 state match - possible bug.
Next by thread: Re: IPv6 state match - possible bug.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Netfilter Development] [Linux Kernel Networking Development] [Netem] [Berkeley Packet Filter] [Linux Kernel Development] [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control] [Bugtraq]

Powered by Linux