Re: ICMP nat

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"?????????"
????:  Cedric Blancher
??: ????????? ????????????? ????? ?????? ?????????
????: Re: ICMP nat
CC:  netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


>> My question is: if I, for example, generate icmp packet with icmp-type
>> 11 by packet generator, this packet is not in ESTABLISHED state, and
>> not in conntrack list, and probably should go via NAT table? in
>> practical test, however, that kind of packet not go via NAT!

>If you craft an ICMP error, then it will be given INVALID state as no
>previous entry exists in conntrack table to which it can be associated.

which means that such ICMP packet will go via NAT POSTROUTING chain, correct?


-- 
http://sid.rstack.org/
PGP KeyID: 157E98EE FingerPrint: FA62226DA9E72FA8AECAA240008B480E157E98EE
>> Hi! I'm your friendly neighbourhood signature virus.
>> Copy me to your signature file and help me spread!



????/?????: 02.02.2006 17:54:21
???????: + 7 (495) 258-33-44
E-mail: vr@xxxxxxxxx
??? ????: http://www.avtoradio.ru



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux