I'm running the BitTorrent *tracker* here on my local network. I have a
dedicated high-bandwidth server offsite that is seeding the torrents.
The torrent has hardcoded into it the location of the tracker
(http://dns.name.of.my.router:6969/announce), so if I want to download
torrents to a machine on the LAN here, I have to be able to connect to
that machine on that port.
Does that make sense?
Regards,
Jon Heese
Seferovic Edvin wrote:
You welcome :P
But please tell us why do you actually want BT in your LAN? Any good
reasons, or just for fun?
Regards,
Edvin
-----Original Message-----
From: netfilter-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:netfilter-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jon Heese
Sent: Freitag, 28. Oktober 2005 01:50
To: netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Forward internal packets as though they're external
Ah, I was so caught up in iptables, I wasn't even thinking about
routing. Just tried adding a route on Castor to Webster through Router,
and it works. Thanks for all the help, Rob and Edvin.
Regards,
Jon Heese
Seferovic Edvin wrote:
Why don't you tell Castor all packages to Webster over the router? Adding
an
extra route shouldn't be a problem, and the connection tracking would work
in this way... this way you will need an SNAT over the router to
Webster...
Regards,
Edvin
