Re: NAT/POSTROUTING rules doesn't match packets (SOLVED?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 bernin_a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

some connections (udp port 500) and i have the above problem. If i drop the
initial packet of a connection, does it still get an entry in conntrack ?

It should not get into conntrack then.

As an example, i want to snat the udp packets from 192.168.1.2 port 5444
to come from 192.168.1.2 port 500. If i have a rule that blocks this connection,
insert the nat rule first and allow the traffic afterwards, will this work ??

I think so.

Regards
Henrik


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux