Re: NAT/POSTROUTING rules doesn't match packets (SOLVED?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 7 Oct 2005 bernin_a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Do i understand this correctly, the problem why the packets don't get
masqueraded/natted properly is that they already have a conntrack entry
before the nat rules are in place ??

Most likely this is the case in your setup, yes.

Regards
Henrik



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux