Re: ip_nat_mangle_udp_packet: undersized packet

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Caciano Machado <caciano@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: ip_nat_mangle_udp_packet: undersized packet
From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 14:22:16 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: Netfilter Users <netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <4226a8f0510030443m72c02cfj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4226a8f0509301353n4f736156p@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0509302321420.31223@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4226a8f0510030443m72c02cfj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netfilter-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Caciano Machado wrote:

Anyone can tell what is the meaning of this message. I'm getting a lot
of these warnings from kernel:

"ip_nat_mangle_udp_packet: undersized packet"


2.4.25 with patch for sip conntrack helper, on ppc.


May be worth trying upgrading to a more recent kernel version.

Regards
Henrik

References:
- ip_nat_mangle_udp_packet: undersized packet
  - From: Caciano Machado
- Re: ip_nat_mangle_udp_packet: undersized packet
  - From: Henrik Nordstrom

Prev by Date: Re: Iptables and vlan interfaces
Next by Date: Re: Logging SNAT
Previous by thread: Re: ip_nat_mangle_udp_packet: undersized packet
Next by thread: Destination_IP Field in packets coming from QUEUE
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Netfilter Development] [Linux Kernel Networking Development] [Netem] [Berkeley Packet Filter] [Linux Kernel Development] [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control] [Bugtraq]

Powered by Linux