Re: Aren't these connections ESTABILISHED? (2nd take)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: /dev/rob0 <rob0@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Aren't these connections ESTABILISHED? (2nd take)
From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 13:48:40 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200510021613.23410.rob0@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <dhmn38$hsk$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200510021416.39103.rob0@xxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0510022225450.26361@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200510021613.23410.rob0@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netfilter-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Sun, 2 Oct 2005, /dev/rob0 wrote:

Are you saying that RELATED is only known through the use of helper
modules?


Yes.

Regards
Henrik

References:
- Aren't these connections ESTABILISHED? (2nd take)
  - From: Gioele Barabucci
- Re: Aren't these connections ESTABILISHED? (2nd take)
  - From: /dev/rob0
- Re: Aren't these connections ESTABILISHED? (2nd take)
  - From: Jozsef Kadlecsik
- Re: Aren't these connections ESTABILISHED? (2nd take)
  - From: /dev/rob0

Prev by Date: Re: Aren't these connections ESTABILISHED? (2nd take)
Next by Date: Re: Redirect Packets From Interface in Promiscuous Mode
Previous by thread: Re: Aren't these connections ESTABILISHED? (2nd take)
Next by thread: Re: Aren't these connections ESTABILISHED? (2nd take)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Netfilter Development] [Linux Kernel Networking Development] [Netem] [Berkeley Packet Filter] [Linux Kernel Development] [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control] [Bugtraq]

Powered by Linux