It sure is a different network! You see? As I said... something simple was missing! (sorry to not have seen it before). Well done, John! On 9/27/05, John A. Sullivan III <jsullivan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > What is the default gateway for the laptop? How does it get to > 143.233.222.253 since that is on a different network? - John > > On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 09:52 -0700, Alaios wrote: > > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr > > 00:02:3F:6D:70:3E > > inet addr:10.2.4.1 Bcast:10.255.255.255 > > Mask:255.0.0.0 > > inet6 addr: fe80::202:3fff:fe6d:703e/64 > > Scope:Link > > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 > > Metric:1 > > RX packets:3 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 > > frame:0 > > TX packets:394 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 > > carrier:0 > > collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 > > RX bytes:218 (218.0 b) TX bytes:24983 (24.3 > > Kb) > > Interrupt:11 Base address:0x6800 > > > > eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr > > 00:02:2D:3B:1D:96 > > inet addr:143.233.222.77 > > Bcast:255.255.255.255 Mask:255.255.255.192 > > inet6 addr: fe80::202:2dff:fe3b:1d96/64 > > Scope:Link > > UP BROADCAST NOTRAILERS RUNNING MULTICAST > > MTU:1500 Metric:1 > > RX packets:293209 errors:0 dropped:0 > > overruns:0 frame:0 > > TX packets:74 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 > > carrier:0 > > collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 > > RX bytes:364527709 (347.6 Mb) TX > > bytes:19400 (18.9 Kb) > > Interrupt:3 Base address:0x100 > > > > lo Link encap:Local Loopback > > inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 > > inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host > > UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 > > RX packets:54 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 > > frame:0 > > TX packets:54 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 > > carrier:0 > > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 > > RX bytes:3528 (3.4 Kb) TX bytes:3528 (3.4 > > Kb) > > > > Kernel IP routing table > > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags > > Metric Ref Use Iface > > 143.233.222.64 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.192 U > > 0 0 0 eth1 > > 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U > > 0 0 0 eth0 > > 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U > > 0 0 0 lo > > > > > > > > --- Edmundo Carmona <eantoranz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Remove the UDP/port from the rule, that will allow > > > you to PING the > > > box, and the inner box should respond. > > > > > > Anyway, let's go to the basics... what is the output > > > of > > > > > > ifconfig > > > route -n > > > > > > ?? > > > > > > On 9/27/05, Alaios <alaios@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I have done absolutely what u have said.. I have > > > > rechecked the source port and destination and are > > > the > > > > same.... The programme is a packet generator that > > > > creates bulk data. We use it to test oure > > > network.... > > > > I have applied your commands but with a little > > > changes > > > > iptables -nat -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -d > > > 143.233.222.77 > > > > -p udp --destination-port 22453 -j DNAT > > > > --to-destination 10.2.4.1:22453 > > > > My problem is that still i cant see any packages > > > in > > > > the eth0 interface.. What know what else should i > > > do > > > > now > > > > > > > > --- "John A. Sullivan III" > > > > <jsullivan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > It sounds like you really need to learn the > > > basics. > > > > > I would suggest you > > > > > go through the links I mentioned below. What > > > > > exactly do you want to do? > > > > > > > > > > It sounds like you want traffic coming in from > > > > > 143.233.222.253 on tcp > > > > > destination port 22453 (are you sure this is the > > > > > destination port and > > > > > not the source port?????) on the laptop > > > interface > > > > > eth1 with IP address > > > > > 143.233.222.77 to be sent to 10.2.4.1 on the > > > eth0 > > > > > interface. I am > > > > > assuming that 143.233.222.77 and 143.233.222.253 > > > are > > > > > on the same > > > > > network, i.e., the subnet mask is 255.255.255.0 > > > or > > > > > less. I also > > > > > assuming that you have enabled forwarding as you > > > > > said you did. > > > > > > > > > > Then you would do something like: > > > > > > > > > > iptables -F > > > > > iptables -t nat -F > > > > > iptables -P FORWARD DROP > > > > > iptables -t nat -P ACCEPT > > > > > iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -d > > > > > 143.233.222.77 --dport 22453 -j > > > > > DNAT --to-destination 10.2.4.1:22453 > > > > > iptables -A FORWARD -m state --state > > > > > ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT > > > > > iptables -A FORWARD -s 143.233.222.253 -d > > > 10.2.4.1 > > > > > -p 6 --dport 22453 -j > > > > > ACCEPT > > > > > > > > > > I have a sneaking suspicion that 22453 is not > > > the > > > > > destination port. > > > > > What service is 10.2.4.1 providing to > > > > > 143.233.222.253? > > > > > > > > > > I'm afraid I'm running out of time today. I > > > > > probably cannot help much > > > > > more. I'm sure someone else can jump in. Take > > > care > > > > > - John > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 08:40 -0700, Alaios wrote: > > > > > > My complete rule set??? Hm... there is nothing > > > > > like > > > > > > that... I work to a solution for 4-5 hours and > > > > > still > > > > > > havent finded any iptable rule to work.. in my > > > pc > > > > > i > > > > > > dont have any ip rules loaded at all nor a > > > > > firewall > > > > > > applied.. I just want to do only this to > > > work.. Do > > > > > u > > > > > > have anything else in mind plz? > > > > > > > > > > > > --- "John A. Sullivan III" > > > > > > <jsullivan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I made some assumptions about other rules > > > you > > > > > would > > > > > > > have had in place. > > > > > > > I believe someone else posted a much more > > > > > thorough > > > > > > > answer. Did you > > > > > > > create an ESTABLISHED,RELATED rule as that > > > other > > > > > > > post suggested? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would you mind posting your complete rule > > > set > > > > > (with > > > > > > > any sensitive > > > > > > > information edited, of course)? - John > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 08:30 -0700, Alaios > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Thx for your quick reply..... i have just > > > > > tested > > > > > > > but > > > > > > > > it didnt work... I think that i cant > > > explain > > > > > what > > > > > > > i > > > > > > > > need or i am doing sth wrong.. > > > > > > > > i have enabled the packets loging > > > > > > > > so executing dmesg prints the following > > > > > > > > IN=eth1 OUT= MAC=(the mac addresses) > > > > > > > > As u can see the OUT is null which means > > > thats > > > > > > > perhaps > > > > > > > > the problem... What do u have in mind? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- "John A. Sullivan III" > > > > > > > > <jsullivan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 11:14 -0400, John > > > A. > > > > > > > Sullivan > > > > > > > > > III wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 07:57 -0700, > > > Alaios > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi plz take a look at the following > > > > > example > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The laptop has 2 ethernet interfaces > > > > > > > > > > > To eth1 comes traffic from src > > > > > > > 143.233.222.253 > > > > > > > > > > > The eth0 has ip address 10.2.4.2 and > > > it > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > connected > > > > > > > > > > > back to back with eth1 of other pc > > > with > > > > > ip > > > > > > > > > address > > > > > > > > > > > 10.2.4.1 > > > > > > > > > > > I want to forward the traffic with > > > src > > > > > > > > > 143.233.222.253 > > > > > > > > > > > to the 10.2.4.1 pc and if it works i > > > > > will > > > > > > > redo > > > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > > > for a second pc so as to l send the > > > > > traffic > > > > > > > to a > > > > > > > > > third > > > > > > > > > > > on. > > > > > > > > > > > Can u help me plz? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have tried this one > > > > > > > > > > > iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i > > > eth1 -s > > > > > > > > > > > 143.233.222.253 -j DNAT > > > --to-destination > > > > > > > > > 10.2.4.1 > > > > > > > > > > > i have also set the > > > > > > > > > > > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward to 1 > > > > > > > > > > > but still i cant see any trafiic to > > > eth0 > > > > > > > > > interface (ip > > > > > > > > > > > 10.2.4.2) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have also tested this one > > > > > > > > > > > iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp > > > -d > > > > > > > > > 143.233.222.77 > > > > > > > > > > > (laptop eth1 card) --dport 22453 (i > > > have > > > > > > > cheched > > > > > > > > > dst > > > > > > > > > > > port with tcpdump) 00 -j DNAT > > > > > > > --to-destination > > > > > > > > > > > 10.2.4.1 > > > > > > > > > > > this still doesnt work > > > > > > > > > > > Every time i try to apply a new rule > > > i > > > > > use > > > > > > > first > > > > > > > > > > > the iptables -F > > > > > > > > > > > iptables -t nat -F command > > > > > > > > > > <snip> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm a little confused about what you > > > are > > > > > > > doing. I > > > > > > > > > would normally refer > > > > > > > > > > you to Oskar Andreasson's excellent > > > > > tutorial > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://iptables-tutorial.frozentux.net/iptables-tutorial.html > > > > > > > > > or the > > > > > > > > > > training slides on the ISCS web site > > > > > > > > > (http://iscs.sourceforge.net) but, > > > > > > > > > > since it appears that you have an > > > > > emergency, > > > > > > > here > > > > > > > > > goes: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First, if the source is > > > 143.233.222.253, > > > > > you > > > > > > > would > > > > > > > > > not want to DNAT it. > > > > > > > > > > DNAT changes the destination. Thus, > > > your > > > > > > > second > > > > > > > > > attempt is the correct > > > > > > > > > > one. You might want to lock the > > > > > destination > > > > > > > port > > > > > > > > > - it's not likely to > > > > > > > > > > be a problem but, if it ever is, it > > > will > > > > > be > > > > > > > one of > > > > > > > > > those really hard to > > > > > > > > > > diagnose, sporadic problems: > > > > > > > > > > -j DNAT --to-destination > > > 10.2.4.1:22453 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Second, this only takes care of the > > > > > > > addressing. > > > > > > > > > You must still allow > > > > > > > > > > the traffic in the FORWARD chain of > > > the > > > > > filter > > > > > > > > > table, e.g., > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > iptables -A FORWARD -d 10.2.4.1 -p 6 > > > > > --dport > > > > > > > 22453 > > > > > > > > > -j ACCEPT > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hope this helps - John > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Oh, yes, you wanted to restrict the > > > source > > > > > > > address. > > > > > > > > > Add that to your > > > > > > > > > filter table rule: > > > > > > > > > iptables -A FORWARD -s 143.233.222.253 > > > -d > > > > > > > 10.2.4.1 > > > > > > > > > -p 6 --dport 22453 -j > > > > > > > > > ACCEPT > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > John A. Sullivan III > > > > > > > > > Open Source Development Corporation > > > > > > > > > +1 207-985-7880 > > > > > > > > > jsullivan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you would like to participate in the > > > > > > > development > > > > > > > > > of an open source > > > > > > > > > enterprise class network security > > > management > > > > > > > system, > > > > > > > > > please visit > > > > > > > > > http://iscs.sourceforge.net > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > > > > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best > > > spam > > > > > > > protection around > > > > > > > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > John A. Sullivan III > > > > > > > Open Source Development Corporation > > > > > > > +1 207-985-7880 > > > > > > > jsullivan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Financially sustainable open source > > > development > > > > > > > http://www.opensourcedevel.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > > > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > > > > > protection around > > > > > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > -- > > > > > John A. Sullivan III > > > > > Open Source Development Corporation > > > > > +1 207-985-7880 > > > > > jsullivan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > > > > Financially sustainable open source development > > > > > http://www.opensourcedevel.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________ > > > > Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 > > > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________ > > Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > -- > John A. Sullivan III > Open Source Development Corporation > +1 207-985-7880 > jsullivan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Financially sustainable open source development > http://www.opensourcedevel.com > >
