I have already set up routes exactly like that one. :-) The purpose is that I want to have a static IP on my home box. I have a /28 addressed on a box so I thought I could tunnel one of these addresses to my box home. And the problem; when I ping/ssh/whatever 192.121.234.213 from the /28-box (box1), the traffic goes through 10.1.0.1 to 10.1.0.2 and reaches my home box. But when I ping/ssh/whatever from outside the traffic goes to box1. That's why I think NATing the connections will solve the problem. But maybe I'm wrong? > IPTABLES? I think it's a routing problem, not a firewall one. > > ip route add 192.121.234.213 via 10.1.0.2 > I think that would do the first part of your problem. > > But why do you have an IP address (not 127/8) set on a loopback interface? > > On 9/9/05, Jonathan <phonic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hello, >> I have the following interface configuration on two boxes: >> box1: eth0:5 192.121.234.213 netmask 255.255.255.240 broadcast >> 192.121.234.223 >> box2: lo:0 192.121.234.213 netmask 255.255.255.255 >> between box1 and box2 I have a OpenVPN tunnel (endpoints 10.1.0.1 and >> 10.1.0.2). >> >> I want to forward all packages on box1 with destination 192.121.234.213 >> to >> tun0 (10.1.0.1), so they pass through the tunnel and comes to box2. I >> also >> want to forward all packages from tun0 (10.1.0.1) to eth0:5 >> (192.121.234.213). How do I do this with iptables? >> >> Regards >> Jonathan >> >> >> > >
