Re: proper context for connbytes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



cookie wrote:
Hello-
  After trying out several modules from Modwall
http://www.stearns.org/modwall/
  I was stumped when I encountered the mapssh module.
http://www.stearns.org/modwall/mapssh

##    The mapssh module uses some very tight checks to identify the SSH
##protocol string found at the beginning of a connection.  Because it
##strictly limits how many packets it inspects, it _should_ not produce
##high load on the system, even when inspecting every tcp connection.
##There is a small chance of false positives and/or false negatives.
/sbin/iptables -N mapssh
/sbin/iptables -F mapssh
/sbin/iptables -A mapssh -m u32 --u32 '0>>22&0x3C@ 12>>26&0x3C@ 0=0x5353482D' -j LOG --log-prefix mapssh /sbin/iptables -A INPUT -i ! lo -p tcp ! -f -m connbytes --connbytes 0:255 -m state --state ESTABLISHED -m length --length 46:375 -j mapssh /sbin/iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp ! -f -m connbytes --connbytes 0:255 - m state --state ESTABLISHED -m length --length 46:375 -j mapssh /sbin/iptables -A OUTPUT -p tcp ! -f -m connbytes --connbytes 0:255 - m state --state ESTABLISHED -m length --length 46:375 -j mapssh

It all goes well till it hits the 4th line (the first that uses connbytes) then it kicks out: iptables v1.3.3: You must specify `--connbytes'`--connbytes- direction' and `--connbytes-mode'
Try `iptables -h' or 'iptables --help' for more information.

After a day of googling for the correct use of -m connbytes I am at a loss, I was hoping
someone could help me figure this out.  I have tried adding
--connbytes-dir original --connbytes-mode bytes but to no avail.

Hmm - there was a bug in 1.3.1 which stopped it from parsing properly but I just looked and it's fixed in 1.3.3. You still need to specify dir and mode now, though.

Can you search for libipt_connbytes.so to check datestamp/ for multiple copies incase you are using an older version.

You do need connbytes in kernel/as module aswell of course which until very recently involved using POM, and when I last did it (2.6.12-rc1 time) it (POM) failed without messing around.

Andy.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux