RE: ROUTE woes ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "'Jan Engelhardt'" <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: ROUTE woes ?
From: "Ruben Cardenal" <ruben@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 08:18:54 +0200
Cc: "'Brent Clark'" <bclark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'iptables'" <netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0508240753570.16890@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netfilter-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcWocHFD96jOlJrQQ1yuF3Dbaiuu9QAAxARQ

> >  It must be used on the POSTROUTING chain of the mangle table.
> 
> Hm this sounds somewhat illogical: to route when "routing has already been
> done" (latin: postrouting).

http://www.netfilter.org/patch-o-matic/pom-extra.html#pom-extra-ROUTE

  Btw: It works.

  Regards,

- Ruben

References:
- RE: ROUTE woes ?
  - From: Jan Engelhardt

Prev by Date: Re: /dev/rob0 Need to secure up server. But want to use qmail sending and php mx functions
Next by Date: Re: ROUTE woes ?
Previous by thread: RE: ROUTE woes ?
Next by thread: Re: ROUTE woes ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Netfilter Development] [Linux Kernel Networking Development] [Netem] [Berkeley Packet Filter] [Linux Kernel Development] [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control] [Bugtraq]

Powered by Linux