Re: CLUSTERIP problems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 09:40:26PM +0200, Piotr Chytla wrote:
> I've problem with CLUSTERIP from 2.6.12 kernel, both nodes run debian
> sarge on 2.6.12.
> 
> 
[..]
> On the first machine I have in logs only this :
> 
> hash=1 ct_hash=1 not responsible
> 
> ARP mangling patch for 2.6.12 is applied :
> 
> http://patchwork.netfilter.org/netfilter-devel/patch.pl?id=2643
> 
Problem was in wrong header file ipt_CLUSTERIP.h that is diffrent 
between iptables tree and 2.6.12 kernel . 

It seems that in struct ipt_clusterip_tgt_info, *config pointer 
was moved up.

First file ipt_CLUSTERIP.h.20050630 is from iptables tree second
one from 2.6.12 kernel.

--- ipt_CLUSTERIP.h.20050630    2005-03-07 15:00:35.000000000 +0100
+++ ipt_CLUSTERIP.h     2005-06-17 21:48:29.000000000 +0200
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
 struct ipt_clusterip_tgt_info {
 
        u_int32_t flags;
+       struct clusterip_config *config;
        
        /* only relevant for new ones */
        u_int8_t clustermac[6];
@@ -26,12 +27,6 @@
        u_int16_t local_nodes[CLUSTERIP_MAX_NODES];
        enum clusterip_hashmode hash_mode;
        u_int32_t hash_initval;
-       
-#ifdef KERNEL_64_USERSPACE_32
-       u_int64_t config;
-#else
-       struct clusterip_config *config;
-#endif
 };
 
 #endif /*_IPT_CLUSTERIP_H_target*/

/pch

-- 
Dyslexia bug unpatched sinse 1977 ...
exploit have leaked to the underground.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux