CLUSTERIP and ProxyARP?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: netfilter <netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: CLUSTERIP and ProxyARP?
From: Tobias DiPasquale <codeslinger@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 18:45:34 -0400
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=FlWrfZGyWssGQ3ULSPvA+SfQhBbXO3aQ7TqJRmwTGMbe6p4cxSwjutrjmjeQwxJOjGtUNQ9rwO0M09zPIQmdtxgN+hGF6Az3H4T8c4PydeP0TXTStPbklfKUelO5NIrVXQJh2h08iCZF1v2MmO7L5MX8mstpdfkMSb3xcx/vgIs=
Reply-to: Tobias DiPasquale <codeslinger@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netfilter-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hi all,

Does anyone know if ipt_CLUSTERIP and ProxyARP will work correctly
together on a current Linux kernel? Anything special to watch out for?
TIA :)

-- 
[ Tobias DiPasquale ]
0x636f6465736c696e67657240676d61696c2e636f6d

Prev by Date: Re: SNAT or SAME logging
Next by Date: Prob with REDIRECT + SQUID + IPTABELS + IPROUTE2
Previous by thread: dual/triple adsl router natting problem
Next by thread: Prob with REDIRECT + SQUID + IPTABELS + IPROUTE2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Netfilter Development] [Linux Kernel Networking Development] [Netem] [Berkeley Packet Filter] [Linux Kernel Development] [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control] [Bugtraq]

Powered by Linux