Re: Re: Firewall with only one eth0 device: possible?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks for the hint, Grant

I found some documentation on that in the datasheet of realtek 8309 switch controller and on a support page of zyxel. The realtek datasheet says that there are 4 tag/untag modes in that chip but does not tell you when the tagging or untagging is done (ingress or egress?) On zyxel support page was stated that tagging will be done on ingress an untagging on egress if any tag changing is done at all. The zyxel approach sound good to me.

I hope all switch conntroller manufacturer implemented the IEEE 802.1q standard the same way. I do not know how much freedom there is the interpret 802.1q in different ways.

Do you or someone know what happens if tagged ethernet frames leave the switch ports A (VLAN1) and C (VLAN2, port B was the path to the uClinux eth0.1 /eth0.2) and VLAN unaware clients are hooked to this network segment? Will they cope with the VLAN frames and understand them? Or will they confuse the unaware devices and get dropped?

Thanks for any further advice


Roman


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux