Re: NAT performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



No i don't change the value : 65528
But my test is to receive 50Mo of data, so the conntrack is established only one time for each client .. so i should have only 100 conntracking entries


Thx.
--
Christophe Suire

Le 13 mai 05 à 11:57, Jozsef Kadlecsik a écrit :

On Fri, 13 May 2005, Christophe SUIRE wrote:


A great paper !
But i have done some bandwidth tests which is quiet different ..
I know that NAT *is* expensive .. but i'm surprise that there no
bandwidth difference between 20 client and 100 client.
So i would like to understand why this limit ?


Sorry, but I have to ask: don't you hit the limit of ip_conntrack_max?

Best regards,
Jozsef
-
E-mail  : kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
PGP key : http://www.kfki.hu/~kadlec/pgp_public_key.txt
Address : KFKI Research Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics
          H-1525 Budapest 114, POB. 49, Hungary






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux