ICMP rule for stateful firewall

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: ICMP rule for stateful firewall
From: Visham Ramsurrun <vishamr2000@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 14:15:51 +0400
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=JmmOKVVHOaDGCklEx0739+28gOzcApPh7VfrpReFILdvFKqLzxXbI3zbtQjRK+dd/HohEABJxfzzGK3DxhdevL7gdsEMBlRFMUA/AnJmZcPDKIGzkPGwfBbiz/qvvY1VvzdETLK96K5cpbTyM+2YWEQGDG5AV9HrnfK7I/5fLsQ=
Reply-to: Visham Ramsurrun <vishamr2000@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netfilter-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hi to all,

I wanted to ask if such a rule was possible:

iptables -A FORWARD -i eth0 -o eth0 -s 192.168.10.0/24 -d
192.168.10.0/24 -m state --state NEW,ESTABLISHED,RELATED -p icmp
--icmp-type echo request -j ACCEPT

Regards,
Visham

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ICMP rule for stateful firewall
  - From: Jason Opperisano
- Re: ICMP rule for stateful firewall
  - From: Taylor, Grant

Prev by Date: iptables-1.3.1 problem --> libnet doesnt work
Next by Date: Re: How to masquerade when using ROUTE
Previous by thread: iptables-1.3.1 problem --> libnet doesnt work
Next by thread: Re: ICMP rule for stateful firewall
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Netfilter Development] [Linux Kernel Networking Development] [Netem] [Berkeley Packet Filter] [Linux Kernel Development] [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control] [Bugtraq]

Powered by Linux