On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 17:23:16 +0200, Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 10:19:11PM +0900, kesan wrote: > > When is support NAT table for Ip6tables? > > Only over my dead body. We will never implement ipv6-to-ipv6 network > address translation as long as I have any say in netfilter/iptables > development. NAT is evil and causes horrible breakage of end-to-end on > the internet. IPv6 has enough addresses and therefore no justification > for NAT. > > -- > - Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> http://netfilter.org/ > ============================================================================ > "Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early > architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going > on while IP was being designed." -- Paul Vixie > > > One of the benefits of IPv6 is that we get ride of NATing, so, don't think to re-use NATing in IPv6 networks. -- Mohamed Eldesoky www.eldesoky.net RHCE
