Switch packet leakage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: netfilter <netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Switch packet leakage
From: Mohamed Eldesoky <eldesoky.lists@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 13:23:28 +0200
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=bbvkLujh1mVw7W7FlVQWkUfea+Pe0qi9QkX/iYujR1wVTCXWFGXyO3RZ97MmbU3C+WjmasZVqxU6C7DcZQMihniok0jUm5jGVU3Jzi0vNxC9nyzM8muRjDaDotwRC4MrryPbEaug1ykr9nkh4oOQW2XFCNmjhFbQJHl/k+3uRJw=
Reply-to: Mohamed Eldesoky <eldesoky.lists@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netfilter-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I heard that switches are not 100% perfect.
I mean sometimes it leakes packages to different ports, and you can
see packets not destined to you. Much like a hub.
Have you experienced that before ??

-- 
Mohamed Eldesoky
www.eldesoky.net

Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: Switch packet leakage
  - From: Jason Opperisano

Prev by Date: Re: iptables query
Next by Date: RE: 2.6, pptp and gre
Previous by thread: iptables and VPN
Next by thread: Re: OT: Switch packet leakage
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Netfilter Development] [Linux Kernel Networking Development] [Netem] [Berkeley Packet Filter] [Linux Kernel Development] [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control] [Bugtraq]

Powered by Linux