After I had applied the solution bellow I got the follwing msg error: Neighbour table overflow. Tks ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sebastiao Antonio Campos (GWA)" <sa.campos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "Netfilter list" <netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Sertys" <sertys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 9:51 PM Subject: Re: Two netwok cards to access the internet. > Thanks. > > It is working good. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sertys" <sertys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Netfilter list" <netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 7:24 PM > Subject: Re: Two netwok cards to access the internet. > > > On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 18:54:26 -0300, SebastiГЈo AntГґnio Campos > <sa.campos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Well, that's easy. When you know the ports you want to map through the > interfaces, just do > > iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -m multiport -p tcp -s 172.17.1.8 --dports > 25,110,1723,1701,47 -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE > iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 172.17.0.0/16 -o eth2 -j MASQUERADE > or even better > iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 172.17.0.0/16 -o eth2 -j SNAT > --to-source $ETH2_IP > > Those are simple states, you might add --syn or -m state, it's a choice of > yours anyway. > > > > Hi! > > > > I have the following: > > > > A RedHat 9.0 with 3 Network cards: One we use in local network (eth1) > > and the other (eth0 and eth2) to access the internet. > > > > I'd like to separate the traffic. In the eth0 use only with the e-mail > > server (pop, smtp, 1723, 1701 and protocol 47) and the eht0 with others > > traffis (http, https, msn....). > > > > I tried > > > > iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth2 -s 172.17.1.8 -j MASQUERADE > > (--this ip addrs is pop and smtp server) > > iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -s 172.17.0.0/16 -j MASQUERADE > > > > But when I did this I could not access the port 1723, 1701 and protocol > > 47 using the eth2. > > > > I tried too use only iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth2 -s > > 172.17.0.0/16 -j MASQUERADE > > > > And I got the same prob. > > > > If I use iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 172.17.0.0/16 -j MASQUERADE > > > > I will get a success access. Only when I use iptables -t nat -A > > POSTROUTING -s 172.17.0.0/16 -j MASQUERADE (without -o eth2 or -o eth0). > > > > > > Who could help me? > > > > Thanks > > > > > > SebastiРіo AntС„nio Campos > > Infojoi Computadores Ltda > > Joinville -SC - R. IririСЉ, 3587 > > Cml. (47) 437-0796 - Cel. (47) 9927-5349 > > tiao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > http://www.lupusnet.com.br > > > > -- > www.supportivo.org > > I can't stop myself checking for pigs in the outlets. Everybody thinks i'm > a punk, cause of the hairstyle(220V). > end >