Re: HTTP Port-forwarding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 20:09, Rudi Starcevic wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I have these rules below to enable:
> 
> a) http port-forwarding in requests
> b) masquerading rules for http replies.
> 
> It does seem to work OK but is very slow. After hours of looking I think
> the problem as to why it is so slow may be in my Iptables rules.
> 
> Can you see a double up or something that may cause a problem ?
> Or would you say it all looks fine and my problem is elsewhere ?
> 
> Thank you ..
> 
> $IPTABLES -P INPUT DROP
> $IPTABLES -P OUTPUT DROP
> $IPTABLES -P FORWARD DROP
> 
> # http requests:
> # Port-Forwarding setup
> $IPTABLES -t nat -A PREROUTING -i $ETH0 -p tcp --dport 80 -d 
> 66.xxx.xx.100 -j DNAT --to 192.168.0.10:80
> 
> # http replies:
> # ENABLE NAT
> echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
> 
> # NAT Forwarding Setup
> $IPTABLES --table nat --append POSTROUTING --out-interface $ETH0 -j 
> MASQUERADE
> $IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $ETH1 -j ACCEPT
> $IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $ETH0 -j ACCEPT
> $IPTABLES -A FORWARD -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT

you're basically not running a firewall at all--i would look elsewhere. 
the usual suspects:

* DNS resolution timing out
* Network interface speed/duplex mismatches

-j

--
"Another day, another box of stolen pens."
	--The Simpsons



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux