Re: Confused about NAT and forwarding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Confused about NAT and forwarding
From: Kirk <whereisgui@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 13:24:59 -0800
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=pp/srRutd4KqSWwuRCnFuYBAQPbCh/6UhsUEgROusLtzhSuFxBjd/HzrSG6b2WyHs6hQSm6bqZ08wpnufFlPu0elXyjulOMlrl046LiDpz0H1jLGTj0CVBM6Kq6va58sVKp4bO3IEZ2UZxKiY29ZqMEyA9Xr5OaCzYkLJkYwCJc=
In-reply-to: <421BB636.8050104@arcoscom.com>
References: <48be50bb050222142429a5be8f@mail.gmail.com> <421BB636.8050104@arcoscom.com>
Reply-to: Kirk <whereisgui@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netfilter-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> PRIV_PROXY_IP=192.168.0.2
> PUB_PROXY_IP=a.b.c.d
> IPT=iptables
> 
> $IPT -t nat -I POSTROUTING -s $PRIV_PROXY_IP -o eth0 -j SNAT --to
> $PUB_PROXY_IP
> 

I just want to let you guys know that this solution worked. 

Thanks again.

References:
- Confused about NAT and forwarding
  - From: Kirk

Prev by Date: Re: Port-forwarding Perfomance
Next by Date: Re: Port-forwarding Perfomance
Previous by thread: Confused about NAT and forwarding
Next by thread: Re: Confused about NAT and forwarding
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Netfilter Development] [Linux Kernel Networking Development] [Netem] [Berkeley Packet Filter] [Linux Kernel Development] [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control] [Bugtraq]

Powered by Linux