Re: Port 25

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



El mar, 08 de 02 de 2005 a las 14:15, Jason Opperisano escribiÃ:
> i propose that the exact opposite is true.  why should i make my
> firewall undertake the effort of generating a RST packet for every yahoo
> on the Internet that wants to scan my IP range for TCP 139, 445, etc.
> 
> DROP-ing a packet doesn't take any real effort on the firewall's part;
> whereas generating a RST packet adds at least some overhead--which in
> the extreme case could be significant.
> 
> -j

I see your point, but just googling a bit:

http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~peterb/network/drop-vs-reject

so things are maybe somewhat more complex.

Regards.

-- 
Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez
Director Tecnico de bgSEC
jkerouac@xxxxxxxxx
bgSEC Seguridad y Consultoria de Sistemas Informaticos
http://www.bgsec.com
ESPAÃA

The only people for me are the mad ones -- the ones who are mad to live,
mad to talk, mad to be saved, desirous of everything at the same time,
the ones who never yawn or say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn
like fabulous yellow Roman candles.
                -- Jack Kerouac, "On the Road"




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux