Re: IDS better than hardcore iptables rules?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



El dom, 06 de 02 de 2005 a las 21:34, R. DuFresne escribiÃ:
> On 6 Feb 2005, Jose Maria Lopez wrote:
> 
> > El dom, 06 de 02 de 2005 a las 07:29, seberino@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx escribiÃÂ:
> > > Hudson & Ron
> > > 
> > > I'm not sure there even exists documentation to explain
> > > some of the DROP rules I see in firewall scripts.
> > > 
> > > Have you seen guys like these?...
> > > 
> > >  -p tcp --tcp-flags ACK,FIN FIN -j DROP
> > >  -p tcp --tcp-flags ACK,PSH PSH -j DROP
> > >  -p tcp --tcp-flags ACK,URG URG -j DROP
> > > 
> > > What TCP/IP book tells you that FIN, PSH and URG packets
> > > usually have ACK set?  **These** are the rules I don't
> > > know how to understand.
> > > 
> > > Chris
> > 
> > They *don't* have the ACK set, that's because they are
> > dropped, because it's anormal traffic, probably portscans.
> > 
> 
> Can't these kind of packets get handled by an INVALID match, with one
> rule per appropriate chain?
> 

Yes, but remember they use to be portscannings, so take a
watch at the conntrack tables, so it doesn't full it of
shit.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ron DuFresne

Regards

-- 
Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez
Director Tecnico de bgSEC
jkerouac@xxxxxxxxx
bgSEC Seguridad y Consultoria de Sistemas Informaticos
http://www.bgsec.com
ESPAÃA

The only people for me are the mad ones -- the ones who are mad to live,
mad to talk, mad to be saved, desirous of everything at the same time,
the ones who never yawn or say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn
like fabulous yellow Roman candles.
                -- Jack Kerouac, "On the Road"




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux