Re: transparent bridge troubles?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Both host and target have no information about the bridge | firewall in the middle.


----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel Chemko" <dchemko@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "mdpeters" <michael.peters@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Jason Opperisano" <opie@xxxxxxxxxxx>; <netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 4:38 PM
Subject: RE: transparent bridge troubles?



mdpeters wrote:
Du'oh!

I changed it and this is what I see so far. I'm running a Nessus scan
on one side of the bridge and the target system is at the other side
of the bridge.

PRE QUEUEIN=safetynet0 OUT=safetynet0 PHYSIN=eth2 PHYSOUT=eth1
SRC=68.16.185.132 DST=68.16.185.130 LEN=41 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64
ID=3072 PROTO=TCP SPT=3133 DPT=45495 WINDOW=2048 RES=0x00 ACK URGP=0

POST QUEUEIN=safetynet0 OUT=safetynet0 PHYSIN=eth2 PHYSOUT=eth1
SRC=68.16.185.132 DST=68.16.185.130 LEN=41 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64
ID=3072 PROTO=TCP SPT=3133 DPT=45495 WINDOW=2048 RES=0x00 ACK URGP=0

Ok, since there was no return traffic, I'm assuming that the destination host doesn't know the firewall's in between the two PC's. In 68.16.185.130's arp table, does it have 68.16.185.132 mapped to your firewall's eth1 interface? Is proxyARPing setup on both firewall interfaces? This is leaving my knowledge realm, so if someone else can help..




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux