Re: UDP atack

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 23:21:19 -0200, Bruno Wallace
<bruno.wallace@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello
> did you saw this type of attack?
> 
> tcpdump
> 22:42:00.565519 83.102.166.7 > 200.123.456.789: udp (frag 53995:25@512)
> 22:42:20.174143 83.102.166.7 > 200.123.456.789: udp (frag 34877:25@512)
> 22:44:45.756888 83.102.166.7 > 200.123.456.789: udp (frag 46589:25@512)
> 22:46:40.741492 83.102.166.7 > 200.123.456.789 udp (frag 4052:25@512)
> 22:47:02.074045 83.102.166.7 > 200.123.456.789: udp (frag 17141:25@512

Are you sure it's not gaming traffic?

-- 
Jiann-Ming Su
"I have to decide between two equally frightening options. 
 If I wanted to do that, I'd vote." --Duckman


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux