Re: protocol 50 unreachable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



My kernel is 2.4.18-24.8.0 - h.

On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 at 15:56 -0500, netfilter-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

JO> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 11:26:22AM -0800, Helge Weissig wrote:
JO> > I mean with "incomplete" that the tcpdump traffic I see does not show up 
JO> > in the logs. I used your rules at the end of your reply and see the same 
JO> > thing: ESP from VPN_SERVER hits $EXTIF, triggers the "protocol 50 
JO> > unreachable" icmp response and no log entry ever shows up in the kernel 
JO> > log from the iptables log rule. I am suspecting that your option 3) is 
JO> > indeed the problem.
JO> > 
JO> > h.
JO> 
JO> what kernel are you running on this firewall [*]?  the only plausible
JO> explanation at this point (and i'm not even sure that this is possible)
JO> is that you're running an IPsec-enabled kernel that has SPD entries in
JO> it that is scarfing up the ESP packets prior to the PREROUTING netfilter
JO> hooks.  i'm not sure that the last part is even possible though, as i
JO> was under the impression that ESP packets fully travel through PREROUTING
JO> and INPUT before they get processed by the kernel IPsec code...
JO> 
JO> [*] if the answer is 2.6, the output of "setkey -aPD" should be:
JO>     No SPD entries.
JO> 
JO> -j
JO> 
JO> --
JO> "I hope I didn't brain my damage."
JO>         --The Simpsons
JO> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux