I have a somewhat odd scenario that requires the same pools of 192.168 IPs to be bound to eth1 and eth2 on the same machine. I need to NAT another pool of 10.x.x.x IPs bound to eth0 to these two pools of 192.168 IPs. The setup is as follows: eth0:10.115.0.1/16 -> eth1:192.168.0.1/24 eth0:10.115.0.2/16 -> eth1:192.168.0.2/24 eth0:10.115.0.3/16 -> eth1:192.168.0.3/24 eth0:10.115.0.4/16 -> eth1:192.168.0.4/24 eth0:10.115.0.5/16 -> eth1:192.168.0.5/24 eth0:10.115.0.6/16 -> eth1:192.168.0.6/24 eth0:10.116.0.1/16 -> eth2:192.168.0.1/24 eth0:10.116.0.2/16 -> eth2:192.168.0.2/24 eth0:10.116.0.3/16 -> eth2:192.168.0.3/24 eth0:10.116.0.4/16 -> eth2:192.168.0.4/24 eth0:10.116.0.5/16 -> eth2:192.168.0.5/24 eth0:10.116.0.6/16 -> eth2:192.168.0.6/24 Suse 8.1 has no problem letting me bind the same IPs to eth1 and eth2, since eth1 and eth2 are not on the same physical network. However, I am having problems writing my NAT rules for this scenario. Is this scenario doable under iptables? TIA, Kevin
