On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 14:25, ms419@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Thank you sincerely for your suggestion! You are correct: It is simpler > to use DNAT & MASQUERADE. I tried it & it works. But now, I am trying > to avoid using NAT. > > The problem with NAT (as I understand it) is it rewrites the > destination address, which breaks HTTP/1.0 requests without a Host: > header. By using policy routing, I hope to route traffic through wum > without rewriting the destination address. your "-j REDIRECT" on wum rewrites the destination IP address as well. -j -- Jason Opperisano <opie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
