Re: DNAT and broadcast

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2004-09-02 at 10:11, Ben Murphy wrote:
> I was working with DNAT and I can successfully send a traffic to another 
> machine.  The problem is that broadcast traffic is not routed.  So I added:
> iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p udp -d 192.168.1.255 --dport 3000 -j 
> DNAT --to-destination 172.16.17.21
> 
> This is the only rule.  But nothing is seen by the remote machine. 
> Normal traffic is routed correctly.
> 
> My guess is that even though the IP address has been changed the MAC 
> address has not and that is what is causing the packet to not be routed. 
>   Correct?  Is there a way to do this?

broadcasts are not routed, and they shouldn't be.  if you need
broadcasts to traverse a router, you need to configure a GRE tunnel. 
for the broadcast to have any meaning on the other side of the GRE
tunnel--the layer 3 network needs to be the same on both sides of the
tunnel.  a broadcast sent to 192.168.1.255 has no meaning to
172.16.17.21...

if the broadcasting host need to reach a host on another network, see if
there is a unicast option with your application (analogous to WINS for
NBNAME).

-j

-- 
Jason Opperisano <opie@xxxxxxxxxxx>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux