Re: kernel-2.6: ipsec without devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 05 August 2004 10:33 am, richard lucassen wrote:

> Hello list,
>
> Anyone an explanation (or a link to an explanation) why the IPSEC
> implementation in kernel-2.6 doesn't use devices like "ipsec0"?

My understanding of this is that the kernel developers simply didn't like the 
concept of "virtual" interfaces for no (essential) reason.   When FreeS/WAN 
was a patch to the 2.4 kernel, it was necessary to create these interfaces to 
get things working, but now that the code is integrated inside the kernel 
itself, the pseudo-devices are no longer needed, so they've been removed.

I tend to agree with you that they were a useful way to keep track of which 
packets were going where, and I think from a firewalling point of view the 
new 2.6 implementation of IPsec is not as easy to work with.

Regards,

Antony.

-- 
Late in 1972 President Richard Nixon announced that the rate of increase of 
inflation was decreasing.   This was the first time a sitting president used 
a third derivative to advance his case for re-election.

 - Hugo Rossi, Notices of the American Mathematical Society

                                                     Please reply to the list;
                                                           please don't CC me.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux