On Thursday 05 August 2004 10:33 am, richard lucassen wrote: > Hello list, > > Anyone an explanation (or a link to an explanation) why the IPSEC > implementation in kernel-2.6 doesn't use devices like "ipsec0"? My understanding of this is that the kernel developers simply didn't like the concept of "virtual" interfaces for no (essential) reason. When FreeS/WAN was a patch to the 2.4 kernel, it was necessary to create these interfaces to get things working, but now that the code is integrated inside the kernel itself, the pseudo-devices are no longer needed, so they've been removed. I tend to agree with you that they were a useful way to keep track of which packets were going where, and I think from a firewalling point of view the new 2.6 implementation of IPsec is not as easy to work with. Regards, Antony. -- Late in 1972 President Richard Nixon announced that the rate of increase of inflation was decreasing. This was the first time a sitting president used a third derivative to advance his case for re-election. - Hugo Rossi, Notices of the American Mathematical Society Please reply to the list; please don't CC me.