Re: [OT] Was: ESP does not hit the nat table

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 1 Aug 2004, Antony Stone wrote:

> On Sunday 01 August 2004 8:03 pm, Jason Opperisano wrote:
>
> > <OT>
> >  Where is the new-found obsession with dropping packets in the NAT table
> > coming from? </OT>
>
> Indeed.   A few people here have commented recently that they prefer dropping
> stuff in the PREROUTING nat table instead of waiting until it hits INPUT or
> FORWARD, for things like spoofed packets or invalid TCP flag combinations.

And those forget that conntrack has already seen the packets. Better use
the raw table to drop malformed/spoofed packets.

Best regards,
Jozsef
-
E-mail  : kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
PGP key : http://www.kfki.hu/~kadlec/pgp_public_key.txt
Address : KFKI Research Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics
          H-1525 Budapest 114, POB. 49, Hungary



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux