On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 04:20:53AM +0300, Itrat Rasod Quadri wrote: > I have setup linux routers as shown below > > PC1 R1 R2 R3 R4 PC2 > |---------------| |-------| |--------| |--------| |-----------| > 192.168.10.2 .1 12.1 12.2 13.1 13.2 16.1 16.2 11.1 11.2 > e0 e0 e1 e0 e1 e0 e1 e0 e1 e0 > > I am able to send traffic from PC1 to PC2 but I am unable to receive the > response beyond R3. I am able to set up a bi directional path from R1 to R4 > but unbelievably I can't seem to do the same for PC1 and PC2. Response from a > ping from PC2 doesn't go beyond e0 of R3. > > I have the following settings at R3 It would also help to see the routing table for R3: "route -n" > iptables -F > iptables -P INPUT DROP > iptables -P FORWARD DROP > iptables -A INPUT -i eth0 -d 192.168.11.2 -j ACCEPT > iptables -A FORWARD -i eth0 -d 192.168.11.2 -j ACCEPT > iptables -A OUTPUT -o eth1 -d 192.168.11.2 -j ACCEPT > iptables -A INPUT -i eth1 -d 192.168.10.2 -j ACCEPT > iptables -A FORWARD -i eth1 -d 192.168.10.2 -j ACCEPT > iptables -A OUTPUT -i eth0 -d 192.168.10.2 -j ACCEPT ^^ I think you meant for the last line to be "-o eth0". Without it, you are not permitting locally-originated outbound traffic from R3 to 192.168.10.2. However, the OUTPUT chain is not consulted for routed traffic (only the FORWARD chain is), so that isn't your problem here. > I have set the default route as > > route add default gw 192.168.16.2 dev eth1 > > Using tcpdump I can see the ping response at eth1 of R3 but it doesn't go > beyond that. I tried to add another default route for eth0 as > > route add default gw 192.168.13.1 dev eth0 > > but then the traffic from PC1 doesn't go beyond eth0. Any help will be most > welcome. Your default route should only point to the host (or hosts) that you need to go through to get to the rest of the world. Unless both R2 and R4 have Internet connections, you don't want to do this. Try this, instead: R3# route add -host 192.168.10.2 gw 192.168.13.1 dev eth0 R3# route add -host 192.168.11.2 gw 192.168.16.2 dev eth1 You can get from R1 to R4 because R3 probably has a route to get to R1 (192.168.12.1/32 or 192.168.12.0/30 or whatever). However, R3 does not have a route to PC1's network. -James